Hiver's design decision is easy to state: shared inbox features rendered inside the Gmail interface, so nobody learns a new application. It has a free plan, paid tiers that currently run from about $25 to $85 per user per month on annual billing with a two-seat minimum, SLAs and analytics from the middle tier, and AI included in the paid plans. Teams that go looking for a Hiver alternative usually have one of a handful of reasons, and the first thing to decide is whether the reason is the Gmail-native design itself or something Hiver does inside it.
That decision splits the field in two. Some alternatives keep the promise that nobody leaves Gmail. Others break it deliberately, because what they offer needs its own workspace. Below, both groups, organized by the reason teams tend to give. We build Sektra, which is in the second group, so weigh that entry accordingly.
What are the best Hiver alternatives in 2026?
Inside Gmail: Gmelius, for collaboration plus outreach sequences and boards; Drag, for a kanban view at the lowest price; Keeping, for a small support desk rendered in Gmail. Standalone: Front, for omnichannel operations with routing and SLAs; Missive, for email, messaging, chat and tasks in one app for small teams; Help Scout, for an email-style support desk with a knowledge base. And Sektra, which syncs with Gmail and Outlook rather than replacing or extending them, and adds a memory of every client relationship on top of the shared inbox.
If you want to stay inside Gmail
Gmelius: collaboration with sequences and boards
Gmelius is the closest like-for-like. Shared inboxes, shared labels, notes and assignment inside Gmail, plus email sequences, automation rules and kanban boards that Hiver does not carry. Pricing starts at $19 per user per month on annual billing for the entry tier, with shared inboxes and boards from the $25 Growth tier and a $40 Pro tier above it. For a team that runs outreach as well as a shared address, it is the obvious swap.
Drag: boards at the lowest price
Drag turns the inbox into a board, which suits teams that think in pipelines, and starts around $12 per seat, the cheapest credible entry in the category. It is thinner than Hiver on workflow, reporting and AI, deliberately, and for a small team that wants shared assignment and a visual queue it is the rational buy.
Keeping: a support desk rendered in Gmail
Keeping is the most support-shaped of the Gmail-native tools: tickets, statuses, response tracking and reporting, all inside the Gmail interface, from roughly $12 per seat with agent caps on the lower tier. It overlaps Hiver's core most directly and competes mainly on price and simplicity.
If you are ready to leave Gmail
Front: operations across channels
Teams outgrow Hiver's workflow when inbound has to move between departments on rules, with SLA escalation and cross-team analytics, or when channels beyond email need one queue. Front is the standard destination: $25 per seat on Starter for one channel and up to 10 seats, $65 on Professional for omnichannel and the full workflow engine, $105 on Enterprise, with AI as per-seat add-ons below Enterprise. The price is real and so is the machinery. The Hiver vs Front comparison covers the tradeoff in detail.
Missive: everything in one window for small teams
Missive folds email, SMS, WhatsApp and social messaging together with built-in team chat and tasks, from $14 to $36 per user on annual billing. It asks the whole team to move in, which is the exact opposite of Hiver's bet, and for a small team that wants one application for all of it, that bet can pay off. The condition is full adoption.
Help Scout: a support desk with a knowledge base
If the shared address is really a support function, with volume, one-off requesters and a knowledge base that could answer half of it, Help Scout is built for that. Conversations read like email, AI drafts and summaries are included, automated answers are $0.75 per resolution with a cap, and plans run $25 to $75 per user on monthly billing with a free tier for five users.
If the queue is fine but the client keeps getting forgotten: Sektra
Every tool above, Hiver included, treats the conversation as the unit. It arrives, gets assigned, gets resolved, leaves the queue. For a support address that is correct. For a book of named clients it leaves a gap that no amount of workflow closes: the promise made in a thread that was resolved and archived, the client question that aged inside a thread that already got a reply, the account that wrote every week for two years and then stopped, which produces no message for any inbound-triggered tool to react to.
Sektra is built for that gap. It syncs two-way with Gmail and Outlook, adds WhatsApp, and keeps the shared inbox basics Hiver has, with a memory layer underneath: commitments and open questions per client, each relationship's normal rhythm so silence is flagged early, and an assistant that answers from the history and acts on the inbox. Every AI feature is in the plan price at $29 per seat on Standard and $59 on Pro, billed annually. It is a separate workspace rather than a Gmail add-on, which is a larger change than Hiver asks for and a smaller one than a migration; anyone not yet on Sektra keeps working in Gmail unaffected. Sektra vs Hiver has the row-by-row view, including the SLA and CSAT rows where Hiver is the larger tool.
Which Hiver alternative should you pick?
- Gmelius, if you want to stay in Gmail and add sequences and boards.
- Drag or Keeping, if you want to stay in Gmail and pay less for a simpler tool.
- Front, if the work is omnichannel operations with routing and SLAs, and the team will move.
- Missive, if a small team wants email, messaging, chat and tasks in one app and will fully adopt it.
- Help Scout, if the address is a support desk and a knowledge base belongs at its center.
- Sektra, if the same clients write for years and the misses that cost you are forgotten promises and quiet accounts.
Because Hiver leaves the mail in Gmail, every alternative on this list can be trialed alongside it without moving anything. Two weeks on real mail will tell you more than this article can.



